内容简介
国内外相关学者在二语二语写作领域对纠正反馈问行了持续研究。然而,对于纠正反馈的效应,迄今仍未形成一致结论。纠正反馈的参与主体具有“双元”,即考虑到纠正反馈的特,有效的纠正反馈需要教学者和学共同参与。这意味着参与双方的偏好、经验和积极等个体特征对纠正反馈的效果具有明显影响。显然,二语教学者和学纠正反馈的认知偏差实际上导致了纠正反馈研究和实践的困境:一方面,纠正反馈具有认知的同质,所有参与者都认可其在写作度提高方面的积极作用;另一方面,纠正反馈具有认知的异质,不同参与者对其影响路径和程度的认知存在明显个体;这一共与个的矛盾加剧了纠正反馈研究的困难。
目录
Chapter 1:lntroduction
1.1 Context Analysir>1. 1. 1 EFL Context in China
1.1.2 Context of the Study
1.2 Outline of the Study
Chapter 2: Literature Review
2.1 Form-focused Instruction(FFI)in SLA
2.1.1 Naturalistic Exposure vs. Formal Instruction
2.1.2 Focus on Forms(FonFs)vs. Focus on Form( FonF)
2.1.3 Explicit vs. Implicit Knowledge and Learning
2.1.4 The Role of Grammar Instruction in Pedagogy
2.2 Positive Evidence vs. Negative Evidence in SIA
2.3 Corrective Feedback in 12 Writing
2.3.1 Positions on Corrective Feedback in 12 Learning
2.3.1.1 Arguments against Corrective Feedback
2.3.1.2 Arguments for Corrective Feedback
2.3.1.3 Types of Corrective Feedback
2.3.2 Perceptions of Corrective Feedback in L2 Learning
2.3.2.1 Negative Perceptionr>……
Chapter 3:Methodology
Chapter 4:Quantitative Results: Pretest, Posttest and Delayed Postter>Chapter 5: Mixed Methods Results: Questionnairer>Chapter 6: Qualitative Results: Interviews and Classroom Observation
Chapter 7 : Discussion
Chapter 8:Implications, Recommendations and
Conclusion
Referencer>Appendix A Grading Criteria for Linguistic Accuracy
Appendix B Test promptr>Appendix C Questionnairer>Appendix D Interview Questions in Chiner>Appendix E Examples of Student Errors Across Pretest,
Posttest, and Delayed Posttest in the Three Groupr>Appendix F Text Lengthr>Appendix G Examples of Students' Responses to the
Open-ended Questions In Questionnaire One
Appendix H Abbreviations