内容简介
权力被定义为个体拥有的能够通过给予或收回资源与实施惩罚来改变他人状态的能力。由于拥有权力者掌控着资源，同时拥有与公众利益密切相关的决策权，以来，社会科学家和公众对权力如何影响道德这一问题十分关注。本书围绕“权力如何影响道德决策”这一主行了深入的研究和探讨。书中首先回顾结了过往学者关于权力与道德决策的理论与实证研究，并在此基础上提出权力影响道德决策的理论机制，然后通过十个实证研究详细探索和论证了权力与道德决策间的关系，并探讨了认知风格、目标导向等因素在其中的机制作用。
目录
Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Power 1.1.1 What is Power 1.1.2 Methods and Measures in Power Research 1.1.3 Theories of Power 1.1.4 Consequences of Power 1.1.5 Power and Morality 1.1.6 Summary and Outlook 1.2 Moral Judgmentr/> 1.2.1 Deontology and Utilitarianir/> 1.2.2 Moral Dilemmar/> 1.2.3 Intuitionist and Rationalist Modelr/> 1.2.4 Influencing Factors in Moral Judgmentr/> 1.2.5 Summary and Outlook 1.3 Power and Moral Judgmentr/> 1.3.1 Aims of the Current Studier/> 1.3.2 Power and Moral Judgments in Different Contextr/> 1.3.3 The Role of Cognitive Processing Style 1.3.4 The Role of Goal Focur/> 1.3.5 Summary and Outlook 1.4 Present Research 1.4.1 Is the Association Between Power and Moral Judgments Generalile 1.4.2 How Does the Presence of Harm Modify the Association Between Power and Moral Thi Style 1.4.3 What Is the Role of Processing Style on the links Between Power and Moral Judgmentr/> 1.4.4 Understanding the link Between Power and Moral Judgments With the Situated Theory of Power-the Role of Goals Focur/>Chapter 2 The Replications And Extensions Of Previour/> Findingout Power And Moral Judgmentr/> 2.1 Replication of Previous Findingr/> 2.1.1 Overview 2.1.2 Study 1: Replication Study of Lammers and Stapel (2009) 2.1.3 Study 2: Power and Moral Judgmentr/> in an Organisational Environment 2.1.4 Summary and Outlook 2.2 How Harm Modifies the Association Between Power and Moral Thi Style 2.2.1 Overviewr/> 2.2.2 Study 3: Moral Reasoning in the Presence of Harm 2.2.3 Study 4: Moral Reasoning in the Presence of Impersonal Harm 2.2.4 Summary and outlookChapter 3 Power,Cognitive Processing Style and Moral Judgmentr/> 3.1 Overview 3.2 Study 5:Cognitive Load Increases the Preference for Deontology of the Powerler/> 3.3 Study 6:Deliberative Thi Increaser/> Utilitarian Judgments Among the Powerful 3.4 Summary and OutlookChapter 4 Power Increases Moral Flexibility Via Focal Goal Commitment 4.1 Overviewr/> 4.2 Study 7:Goal Focus Modifies How Power Affects Moral Judgmentr/> 4.3 Study 8: How Power Affects Moral Judgments with Personal Chronic Goalr/> 4.4 Study 9: Power Increases Deontological Judgments via the Chronic Goal of Maintaining Authority 4.5 Study 10: The Mediating Role of Goal Commitment 4.6 Summary and OutlookChapter 5 General Discussion 5.1 Overview 5.2 Summary of the Present Research 5.2.1 Replication 5.2.2 How Harm Modifies the Association Between Power and Moral Judgmentr/> 5.2.3 Power, Cognitive Processing Style and Moral Judgmentr/> 5.2.4 Power Increases Moral Flexibility via Goal Focur/> 5.2.5 Experimental Design 5.2.6 Effect Size 5.3 Implications of the Present Findingr/> 5.3.1 Power and Moral Thi Style 5.3.2 Theories and Research of Power 5.3.3 Theories of Moral Judgmentr/> 5.3.4 Applied Implicationr/> 5.4 Limitationr/> 5.4.1 Boundary Conditions for Power Differences in Moral Judgmentr/> 5.4.2 Further Study about the Role of Cognitive Processing Style 5.4.3 Goal Focur/> 5.4.4 The Utilitarian Judgments of the Powerler/> 5.4.5 Manipulation of Power 5.5 ConclusionAppendix 1Appendix 2Appendix 3Appendix 4Appendix 5Appendix 6Appendix 7Referencer/>